John E. Ampleman v. Janet Schweiss
This text of John E. Ampleman v. Janet Schweiss (John E. Ampleman v. Janet Schweiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 00-2292 ___________
John E. Ampleman; Noel F. * Ampleman, * * Appellants, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Janet Schweiss, individually and in * District Court for the Eastern her official capacity as a caseworker * District of Missouri. for the Missouri Division of Family * Services; George Ann Cooper, * individually and in her official * [UNPUBLISHED] capacity as a caseworker for the * Missouri Division of Family * Services; Missouri Division of * Family Services, * * Appellees. * ___________
Submitted: February 21, 2001 Filed: February 27, 2001 ___________
Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM. John and Noel Ampleman appeal the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in their action alleging due process violations, abuse of process, and malicious prosecution. After de novo review, see Schuver v. MidAm. Energy Co., 154 F.3d 795, 799 (8th Cir. 1998), we agree with the district court, for the reasons explained in its order, that the Amplemans’ action was time-barred.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1 The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John E. Ampleman v. Janet Schweiss, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-e-ampleman-v-janet-schweiss-ca8-2001.