John Dorak A/K/A Peter Dorak v. The County of Nassau, State of New York, (Two Cases). John Dorak v. William Cahn

Second Circuit

John Dorak A/K/A Peter Dorak v. The County of Nassau, State of New York, (Two Cases). John Dorak v. William Cahn

445 F.2d 1023, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9493

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJune 17, 1971

Docket879, Docket 35612

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 445 F.2d 1023 (John Dorak A/K/A Peter Dorak v. The County of Nassau, State of New York, (Two Cases). John Dorak v. William Cahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John Dorak A/K/A Peter Dorak v. The County of Nassau, State of New York, (Two Cases). John Dorak v. William Cahn, 445 F.2d 1023, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9493 (2d Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff’s alleged causes of action for abuse of process against the County of Nassau (69-C-485) and against the District Attorney of Nassau County (69-C-1561) were dismissed upon motion of the respective defendants for failure to state claims upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b) (6), Fed.R.Civ.P. In plaintiff’s third cause of action for false arrest and malicious prosecution against the County of Nassau (69-C-1562), defendant’s motion for summary judgment was granted since there were no material issues of fact and defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P.

We affirm on Judge Travia’s well reasoned opinion, 329 F.Supp. 497 (E.D.N.Y.1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff’s alleged causes of action for abuse of process against the County of Nassau (69-C-485) and against the District Attorney of Nassau County (69-C-1561) were dismissed upon motion of the respective defendants for failure to state claims upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b) (6), Fed.R.Civ.P. In plaintiff’s third cause of action for false arrest and malicious prosecution against the County of Nassau (69-C-1562), defendant’s motion for summary judgment was granted since there were no material issues of fact and defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P.

We affirm on Judge Travia’s well reasoned opinion, 329 F.Supp. 497 (E.D.N.Y.1970).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

445 F.2d 1023, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-dorak-aka-peter-dorak-v-the-county-of-nassau-state-of-new-york-ca2-1971.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack