John Dorak A/K/A Peter Dorak v. The County of Nassau, State of New York, (Two Cases). John Dorak v. William Cahn

445 F.2d 1023, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9493
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 17, 1971·No. 879, Docket 35612·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff’s alleged causes of action for abuse of process against the County of Nassau (69-C-485) and against the District Attorney of Nassau County (69-C-1561) were dismissed upon motion of the respective defendants for failure to state claims upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b) (6), Fed.R.Civ.P. In plaintiff’s third cause of action for false arrest and malicious prosecution against the County of Nassau (69-C-1562), defendant’s motion for summary judgment was granted since there were no material issues of fact and defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P.

We affirm on Judge Travia’s well reasoned opinion, 329 F.Supp. 497 (E.D.N.Y.1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Dorak A/K/A Peter Dorak v. The County of Nassau, State of New York, (Two Cases). John Dorak v. William Cahn, 445 F.2d 1023, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9493 (2d Cir. 1971).

445 F.2d 1023 (John Dorak A/K/A Peter Dorak v. The County of Nassau, State of New York, (Two Cases). John Dorak v. William Cahn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.
540 F. Supp. 706 (S.D. New York, 1982)
Grieco v. Memorial Hospital
385 F. Supp. 798 (S.D. New York, 1974)