John Doe v. Town of W. Hartford

151 A.3d 384, 323 Conn. 936, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 366
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 8, 2016·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 168 Conn.App. 354, 147 A.3d 1083 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

*385"1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court's grant of the defendants' motion for summary judgment on the basis of its determination that a genuine issue of material fact existed with respect to the availability of the savings statute, General Statutes § 52-593a ?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that § 52-593a is available to save a cause of action despite the failure of the serving officer to endorse on the officer's return the date of delivery of the process to such officer pursuant to § 52-593a(b) ?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Doe v. Town of W. Hartford, 151 A.3d 384, 323 Conn. 936, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 366 (Colo. 2016).

151 A.3d 384 (John Doe v. Town of W. Hartford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doe v. Town of W. Hartford
177 A.3d 1128 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2018)