John Doe v. Kachalia
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN DOE, Plaintiff(s), 23-CV-10395 (DEH) v. ORDER NEEL H. KACHALIA, ET AL, Defendant(s).
DALE E. HO, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's letter describing the difficulty in locating Defendant Kachalia’s current address for service. See ECF No. 12. Defendant Columbia University shall file a letter providing the contact information for Defendant Kachalia, including the current address for where Kachalia may be served. See Valentin v. Dinkins, 121 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 1997). The letter may be filed with redactions of sensitive information in accordance with Paragraph 6(b) of the Court’s Individual Practices. Defendant Columbia University shall provide this information to Plaintiff and the Court by February 6, 2024. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to mail this Order to pro se Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 9, 2024 New York, New York
DALE E. HO United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
John Doe v. Kachalia (John Doe v. Kachalia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.