JOHN DOE KS v. James

295 S.W.3d 235, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1464, 2009 WL 3364399
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 20, 2009·No. ED 92280·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Doe KS (hereinafter, “Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Mar James (a.k.a. James Beine and hereinafter, “Beine”), the Archdiocese of St. Louis, and Archbishop Raymond L. Burke. 1 Appellant argues the trial court erred in granting summary judgment against him in that his claims are not barred by the statute of limitations and do not offend the First Amendment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. Archbishop Burke was sued only in his representative capacity and not in any personal capacity. On June 10, 2009, Archbishop Robert J. Carlson was installed as Archbishop of St. Louis and succeeds Archbishop Burke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOHN DOE KS v. James, 295 S.W.3d 235, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1464, 2009 WL 3364399 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

295 S.W.3d 235 (JOHN DOE KS v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Winston
295 S.W.3d 235 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)