John Desoto v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.

851 F.2d 1207, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 864, 128 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3040, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9288
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in John Desoto v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 811 F.2d 1333
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 11, 1988·No. 86-5800·Published

Opinion

851 F.2d 1207

128 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3040, 109 Lab.Cas. P 10,603,
3 Indiv.Empl.Rts.Cas. 864

John DeSOTO, Plaintiff/Appellee,
v.
YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant/Appellant.

Nos. 85-6608, 86-5800.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

July 11, 1988.

Theodore W. Russell, John C. Russell, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Robert D. Newman, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Richard W. Smith, Sacramento, Cal., for amicus curiae.

Before ALARCON, BRUNETTI and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

On June 13, 1988, the Supreme Court, 108 S.Ct. 914, vacated this court's judgment in this case and remanded for further consideration in light of Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc., --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 1877, 100 L.Ed.2d 410 (1988). Lingle holds the state law claims that do not require interpretation of a collective-bargaining agreement are not preempted by section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 185. We accordingly reverse our holding that DeSoto's state law claim was preempted by section 301 and remand to the district court for further proceedings on the state law claim.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Desoto v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., 851 F.2d 1207, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 864, 128 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3040, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9288 (9th Cir. 1988).

851 F.2d 1207 (John Desoto v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.
486 U.S. 399 (Supreme Court, 1988)
DeSoto v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.
851 F.2d 1207 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)