John Deere Plow Co. v. Franchise Tax Board of California
343 U.S. 939, 72 S. Ct. 1036, 96 L. Ed. 1345, 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2126
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Butler Bros. v. McColgan, 315 U. S. 501.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
John Deere Plow Co. v. Franchise Tax Board of California, 343 U.S. 939, 72 S. Ct. 1036, 96 L. Ed. 1345, 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2126 (1952).
343 U.S. 939 (John Deere Plow Co. v. Franchise Tax Board of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anaconda Co. v. Franchise Tax Board
130 Cal. App. 3d 15 (California Court of Appeal, 1982)
Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax Bd.
117 Cal. App. 3d 988 (California Court of Appeal, 1981)
American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Idaho State Tax Commission
592 P.2d 39 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1979)
Chase Brass & Copper Co. v. Franchise Tax Board
70 Cal. App. 3d 457 (California Court of Appeal, 1977)
John Deere Co. v. Franchise Tax Board
237 Cal. App. 2d 663 (California Court of Appeal, 1965)
Virginia Electric and Power Company v. Currie
118 S.E.2d 155 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)