John David Galindo v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 3, 2005
Docket13-04-00686-CR
StatusPublished

This text of John David Galindo v. State (John David Galindo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John David Galindo v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-04-686-CR


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________


JOHN DAVID GALINDO,                                                    Appellant,


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                      Appellee.

__________________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 24th District Court

of Calhoun County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, JOHN DAVID GALINDO, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 24th District Court of Calhoun County, Texas. Sentence in this cause was imposed on November 9, 2004. No timely motion for new trial was filed. The notice of appeal was due to be filed on December 9, 2004, but was not filed until December 10, 2004. Said notice of appeal is untimely filed.

         Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 provides that the court of appeals may grant an extension of time for filing notice of appeal if such notice is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed and within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the need for such extension. Appellant failed to file his notice of appeal and a motion requesting an extension of time within such period.

         The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                               PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 3rd day of March, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John David Galindo v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-david-galindo-v-state-texapp-2005.