John Daniel Froneberger v. State of North Carolina
This text of 842 F.2d 1290 (John Daniel Froneberger v. State of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
842 F.2d 1290
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
John Daniel FRONEBERGER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 87-3201.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 5, 1988.
Decided March 14, 1988.
John Daniel Froneberger, appellant pro se.
Edwin Marion Speas, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellee.
Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from its order dismissing plaintiff's complaint is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Froneberger v. State of North Carolina, C/A No. 87-365 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 8, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
842 F.2d 1290, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3103, 1988 WL 21679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-daniel-froneberger-v-state-of-north-carolina-ca4-1988.