John Dalmer Benton v. Maryland

392 U.S. 925
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 17, 1968
Docket1185, Misc
StatusPublished

This text of 392 U.S. 925 (John Dalmer Benton v. Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John Dalmer Benton v. Maryland, 392 U.S. 925 (1968).

Opinion

392 U.S. 925

88 S.Ct. 2297

20 L.Ed.2d 1384

John Dalmer BENTON, petitioner,
v.
MARYLAND.

No. 1185, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 1968

H. Thomas Sisk and M. Michael Cramer, for petitioner.

Francis B. Burch, Atty. Gen. of Maryland, and Edward F. Borgerding, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland granted limited to the following questions:

(1) Is the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment? (2) If so, was the petitioner 'twice put in jeopardy' in this case? Case transferred to the appellate docket and placed on the summary calendar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

West v. California
392 U.S. 663 (Supreme Court, 1968)
Lucke v. Davis
392 U.S. 926 (Supreme Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
392 U.S. 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-dalmer-benton-v-maryland-scotus-1968.