John D. Duncan v. Curtis M. Payson

282 F.2d 898
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedOctober 18, 1960
Docket5687
StatusPublished

This text of 282 F.2d 898 (John D. Duncan v. Curtis M. Payson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John D. Duncan v. Curtis M. Payson, 282 F.2d 898 (1st Cir. 1960).

Opinion

282 F.2d 898

John D. DUNCAN, Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
Curtis M. PAYSON et al., Defendants, Appellees.

No. 5687.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

October 18, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maine; Edward Thaxter Gignoux, Judge.

Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges.

John D. Duncan, pro se, on brief for appellant.

Roger A. Putnam, Portland, on brief for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The order of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duncan v. Payson
282 F.2d 898 (First Circuit, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 F.2d 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-d-duncan-v-curtis-m-payson-ca1-1960.