John D. Brick v. State
This text of 144 So. 3d 698 (John D. Brick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s order which summarily denied appellant’s rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief without ordering a response, without attachments, and without explanation. The State in this appeal concedes that although the motion was facially insufficient, the trial court should have dismissed the motion with leave to amend. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(2); Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754, 761 (Fla.2007). We agree and remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with rule 3.850(f)(2).
Reversed and Remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 So. 3d 698, 2014 WL 4082631, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-d-brick-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.