JOHN CURRY v. THE HONORABLE C. ANDREW FULLER, JUDGE
This text of JOHN CURRY v. THE HONORABLE C. ANDREW FULLER, JUDGE (JOHN CURRY v. THE HONORABLE C. ANDREW FULLER, JUDGE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ March 24, 2025
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A25E0085. JOHN CURRY v. THE HONORABLE C. ANDREW FULLER, JUDGE et al.
“[T]he writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy available in limited circumstances to compel action by a public officer when there is no other adequate legal remedy.” Rabun County v. Mountain Creek Estates, 280 Ga. 855, 857-858 (1) (632 SE2d 140) (2006); see OCGA § 9-6-20. Here, Curry fails to make a showing that he is entitled to relief. Accordingly, Curry’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 03/24/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JOHN CURRY v. THE HONORABLE C. ANDREW FULLER, JUDGE, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-curry-v-the-honorable-c-andrew-fuller-judge-gactapp-2025.