Home/U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts/John Crossley & Sons, Ltd. v. Hogg

John Crossley & Sons, Ltd. v. Hogg

83 F. 488, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2862
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
DecidedMay 15, 1897
DocketNo. 664
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 83 F. 488 (John Crossley & Sons, Ltd. v. Hogg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John Crossley & Sons, Ltd. v. Hogg, 83 F. 488, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2862 (circtdma 1897).

Opinion

COLT, Circuit Judge.

This is a bill in equity, brought for the infringement of letters patent No. 2.3,362, granted June 12, 1894, to (xiulio Slarehetti, for a design for a car-pet. The specification says:

“Tiie body, A, comprises aseries of diamond-shaped figures, die sides of which are formed by a curving' stem-worlr bearing small flower forms. These diamond-shaped figures liave conventional flower forms at their centers, around which are arranged concentric rows of flower and leaf forms, each row or series having Hie same general outline as the main figure. At the bottom of each iigmc is an ornament somewhat resembling a shield or pendant. The border, it. consists of an inner portion and an outer poifion. The inner portion consists of a double line of wavy siem-work, one line bearing small flower forms, and the other bearing leaf-like serrations. In ihe depressions of those wavy linos are bunches or sprays of flower forms surrounded by ornamental stem-work. The outer portion of the border consists of a wavy stem-work bearing small leaf and flower forms, (he crests of the contiguous wave portions being joined by bands of flowery siem-work, each of which is curved so as to form, with its corresponding wave-portion, a circular figuro. In the center of each of those circular figures is a bunch or spray of small flower forms surrounded by an ornamental stem-work.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Potter Instrument Co., Inc. v. ODEC Computer Systems, Inc.
370 F. Supp. 198 (D. Rhode Island, 1974)
Hamilton Laboratories, Inc. v. Massengill
111 F.2d 584 (Sixth Circuit, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 F. 488, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-crossley-sons-ltd-v-hogg-circtdma-1897.