John Crim v. Michael Benov
This text of 471 F. App'x 670 (John Crim v. Michael Benov) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Federal prisoner John Michael Crim appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Crim contends that the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) was required to designate the programs that would qualify him for the full 12-month placement in a Residential Reentry Center (“RRC”), under the Second Chance Act of 2007 (“SCA”). The district court did not err in dismissing Crim’s petition because the SCA does not mandate that the BOP designate which of its programs would make a prisoner eligible for placement in an RRC. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 17501-17555; 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
471 F. App'x 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-crim-v-michael-benov-ca9-2012.