John Chatmon A/K/A John Chatman II v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 22, 2009
Docket04-09-00173-CR
StatusPublished

This text of John Chatmon A/K/A John Chatman II v. State (John Chatmon A/K/A John Chatman II v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John Chatmon A/K/A John Chatman II v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Nos. 04-09-00172-CR and 04-09-00173-CR

John CHATMON, a/k/a John Chatmon II, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 2009-CR-2113W; 2009-CR-2114W Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 22, 2009

DISMISSED

The trial court signed certifications of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea-

bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule

25.2(d) provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the

right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d).

Accordingly, on April 7, 2009, this court issued an order stating these appeals would be dismissed

pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless amended trial court certifications that show defendant has the right 04-09-00172-CR and 04-09-00173-CR

of appeal were made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio 2003, order); TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1.

On April 13, 2009, defendant’s appellate counsel filed a letter stating “this court has no

choice but to dismiss the appeal[s].” In light of the record presented, we agree with defendant’s

counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss these appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are

dismissed.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John Chatmon A/K/A John Chatman II v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-chatmon-aka-john-chatman-ii-v-state-texapp-2009.