John Charles Maley v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 18, 2010·No. 02-10-00054-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO.  2-10-054-CR

JOHN CHARLES MALEY APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1)

------------

On November 17, 2009, appellant John Charles Maley pleaded guilty to possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance of less than one gram.  In accordance with the plea bargain, the trial court sentenced appellant to three years’ imprisonment.  Appellant later filed a motion for new trial and a notice of appeal, but the trial court’s certification of his right to appeal shows that this case “is a plea-bargain case, and [appellant] has NO right of appeal.”

On February 9, 2010, we sent a letter to appellant’s counsel informing her of the trial court’s certification and giving appellant, or any party desiring to continue the appeal, until February 19, 2010, to file a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  We stated that the appeal could be dismissed unless we received such a response.   See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3.  We have not received any response.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.   See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f); Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Jackson v. State , 168 S.W.3d 239, 243 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, no pet.).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  March 18, 2010

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Charles Maley v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

John Charles Maley v. State (John Charles Maley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chavez v. State
183 S.W.3d 675 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Jackson v. State
168 S.W.3d 239 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)