John Charles Callahan v. United States

367 F.2d 563
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 6, 1966·No. 20886·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case is a companion to Hayter v. United States, 9 Cir., 362 F.2d 973, and involves the same robbery of the First National Bank of Nevada. We affirm the conviction.

The bank’s F.D.I.C. charter was put in evidence to prove the bank was federally insured. We cannot agree with defendant-appellant that this was not enough. Cook v. United States, 5 Cir., 320 F.2d 258.

On the search made of the house of Mrs. Price, good friend of Hayter, there was complete consent of Mrs. Price. In our view, Burge v. United States, 9 Cir., 333 F.2d 210, rehearing 342 F.2d 408 and Nelson v. People of State of California, 9 Cir., 346 F.2d 73, support the government rather than Callahan, as he contends. Therefore, we reject the attack on the search which produced a gun of the type used in the robbery and much of the money taken in the robbery. (Some of the money had been pre-marked by the bank in anticipation of any holdup.)

For the reasons above and those given in Hayter, supra, we decline to reverse.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Charles Callahan v. United States, 367 F.2d 563 (9th Cir. 1966).

367 F.2d 563 (John Charles Callahan v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. William Deverse
464 F.2d 80 (Eighth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Jimmie Dale Phillips
427 F.2d 1035 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. William Derrace Ballard
418 F.2d 325 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)