John Cavanaugh v. Charles J. Long

252 F.2d 959
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 24, 1958·No. 15530·Published

Opinion

252 F.2d 959

John CAVANAUGH, Appellant,
v.
Charles J. LONG, Appellee.

No. 15530.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

February 24, 1958.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada; John R. Ross, Judge.

Grubic, Drendel & Bradley, William O. Bradley, Reno, Nev., for appellant.

Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Elizabeth Dudley, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Franklin P. R. Rittenhouse, U. S. Atty., Las Vegas, Nev., for appellee.

Before HEALY, LEMMON, and BARNES, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM.

The judgment below is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion and order of the trial judge on the motion to dismiss, Cavanaugh v. McKenzie, D.C., 159 F. Supp. 555.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Cavanaugh v. Charles J. Long, 252 F.2d 959 (9th Cir. 1958).

252 F.2d 959 (John Cavanaugh v. Charles J. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cavanaugh v. McKenzie
159 F. Supp. 555 (D. Nevada, 1957)