John Cavanaugh v. Charles J. Long
This text of 252 F.2d 959 (John Cavanaugh v. Charles J. Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
252 F.2d 959
John CAVANAUGH, Appellant,
v.
Charles J. LONG, Appellee.
No. 15530.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
February 24, 1958.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada; John R. Ross, Judge.
Grubic, Drendel & Bradley, William O. Bradley, Reno, Nev., for appellant.
Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Elizabeth Dudley, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Franklin P. R. Rittenhouse, U. S. Atty., Las Vegas, Nev., for appellee.
Before HEALY, LEMMON, and BARNES, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM.
The judgment below is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion and order of the trial judge on the motion to dismiss, Cavanaugh v. McKenzie, D.C., 159 F. Supp. 555.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 F.2d 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-cavanaugh-v-charles-j-long-ca9-1958.