John Cangelosi M.D. v. Sagis PLLC
This text of John Cangelosi M.D. v. Sagis PLLC (John Cangelosi M.D. v. Sagis PLLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued December 31, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00348-CV ——————————— JOHN CANGELOSI, MD, Appellant V. SAGIS PLLC, Appellee
On Appeal from the 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2023-75082
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, John Cangelosi, MD, filed an interlocutory appeal from the trial
court’s May 7, 2024 “Order Denying [Appellant’s] Motion to Compel Arbitration
and Stay Litigation.”1 On the motion of appellant, on June 6, 2024, the Court stayed
1 See TEX. CIV. PRAC. REM. CODE ANN. § 51.016. the underlying trial court proceedings pending the Court’s consideration of the
interlocutory appeal.
On July 17, 2024, appellant notified the Court that the “parties [had] reached
a settlement of the disputes between them” and requested that the Court “put this
matter on hold while the parties completed” finalizing the settlement documents.
The Court therefore abated the appeal and removed it from the Court’s active docket
to allow the parties to finalize the necessary settlement documents.
On December 11, 2024, appellant filed a motion to dismiss his interlocutory
appeal “following the resolution of the underlying dispute between the parties by
settlement.” No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Appellant’s motion includes a certificate of
conference stating that appellee, Sagis PLLC, is unopposed to the relief requested in
the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2).
Accordingly, the Court reinstates the appeal on the Court’s active docket, lifts
the stay imposed by the Court’s June 6, 2024 order, grants appellant’s motion, and
dismisses the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Rivas-Molloy and Gunn.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John Cangelosi M.D. v. Sagis PLLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-cangelosi-md-v-sagis-pllc-texapp-2024.