John C. Roth Packing Co. v. Wainer

Hamilton Circuit Court

John C. Roth Packing Co. v. Wainer

23 Ohio C.C. Dec. 636, 15 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 166, 1912 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 197

DecidedAugust 3, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 23 Ohio C.C. Dec. 636 (John C. Roth Packing Co. v. Wainer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John C. Roth Packing Co. v. Wainer, 23 Ohio C.C. Dec. 636, 15 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 166, 1912 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 197 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

SMITH, P. J.

Under the conflicting evidence in the above causé this court can not say that the verdict and judgment rendered thereon are against the weight of the evidence, nor that defendant in error was guilty of contributory negligence.

The jury no doubt considered the age of the plaintiff below and found under all the circumstances that he, a boy of tender years, was free from negligence.

We do not think there was prejudicial error relative to the evidence concerning the X-Ray photographs, and the court was correct in overruling the motions of plaintiff in error for an instructed verdict.

As there is no error in the record the judgment is affirmed.

Swing and Jones, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI