John C. Odom v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

John C. Odom v. State

193 So. 3d 1082

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 13, 2016

Docket5D16-478

StatusPublished

This text of 193 So. 3d 1082 (John C. Odom v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John C. Odom v. State, 193 So. 3d 1082 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JOHN C. ODOM,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D16-478

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed June 17, 2016

Petition Alleging Ineffectiveness of Appellate Counsel, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

John C. Odom, Century, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of appellate

counsel is denied without prejudice to petitioner timely filing a motion for postconviction

relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

PETITION DENIED.

COHEN, BERGER, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI