John C. Fulford v. A. L. Dutton, Warden, Georgia State Prison

380 F.2d 16, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5706
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 6, 1967
Docket24306
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 380 F.2d 16 (John C. Fulford v. A. L. Dutton, Warden, Georgia State Prison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John C. Fulford v. A. L. Dutton, Warden, Georgia State Prison, 380 F.2d 16, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5706 (5th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was tried and convicted of robbery with an offensive weapon. Although the jury recommended that the crime be treated as a misdemeanor, the trial judge refused to act upon that recommendation and sentenced appellant to serve ten years in the Georgia penitentiary. The conviction was affirmed by the Georgia Supreme Court. Appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus was denied by the Georgia courts. Appellant has exhausted his state remedies.

Appellant filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus with the District Court. After holding an evidentiary hearing the District Court denied the petition from which this appeal was taken. We affirm.

*17 Appellant attacks the sufficiency and admissibility of the evidence offered to convict him. This is unavailing because insufficiency of the evidence is not reviewable by writ of habeas corpus in the federal courts. Fernandez v. Klinger, 9 Cir. 1965, 346 F.2d 210, 211. Appellant also contends that he is innocent and could establish an alibi through certain records located in Alabama. However, innocence is not a proper matter for consideration in a habeas corpus proceeding. Palakiko v. Harper, 9 Cir. 1953, 209 F.2d 75, 95.

Appellant further urges that the trial judge erred in setting a ten year sentence instead of following the jury’s recommendation. The law in Georgia provides that “it is in the ‘discretion of the trial judge whether he will approve such recommendation, and his action in the matter is final.’ * * * ” Harris v. Georgia, 216 Ga. 740, 119 S.E.2d 352.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pitts v. Hopper
402 F. Supp. 119 (N.D. Georgia, 1974)
Bonaparte v. Smith
362 F. Supp. 1315 (S.D. Georgia, 1973)
Cleophus Young v. State of Alabama
443 F.2d 854 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
Jackson v. Bergeron
306 F. Supp. 1263 (E.D. Louisiana, 1969)
Hayes v. Wainwright
302 F. Supp. 716 (N.D. Florida, 1969)
Bouchillon v. Beto
300 F. Supp. 681 (N.D. Texas, 1969)
Webster v. Peyton
294 F. Supp. 1359 (E.D. Virginia, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
380 F.2d 16, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-c-fulford-v-a-l-dutton-warden-georgia-state-prison-ca5-1967.