John C. Edwards, III v. Hoar Construction
This text of John C. Edwards, III v. Hoar Construction (John C. Edwards, III v. Hoar Construction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Baker, Elder and Fitzpatrick
JOHN C. EDWARDS, III
v. Record No. 0095-97-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM HOAR CONSTRUCTION, INC. JUNE 17, 1997 AND NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (William E. Baggs, on brief), for appellant.
(Fay F. Spence; Spence & Whitlow, on brief), for appellees.
John C. Edwards, III (claimant) contends that the Workers'
Compensation Commission (commission) erred in finding that he
failed to prove that his June 1, 1994 automobile accident
constituted a compensable consequence of his July 14, 1985
industrial injury. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of
the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit.
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule
5A:27.
On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable
to the prevailing party below. See R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v.
Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990).
Unless we can say as a matter of law that claimant's evidence
sustained his burden of proof, the commission's findings are * Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. binding and conclusive upon us. See Tomko v. Michael's
Plastering Co., 210 Va. 697, 699, 173 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1970).
On July 14, 1985, claimant sustained multiple injuries,
including head trauma, when he fell five stories at a
construction site. Two years after the July 1985 compensable
accident, claimant developed post-traumatic seizure disorder.
His physicians prescribed medication to control the seizures.
Prior to June 1994, claimant's last seizure occurred in 1991. On
June 1, 1994, while driving to work, claimant recalled seeing a
gas station and planning to stop for gas. The next event he
remembered was waking up and seeing a police officer. Claimant
did not know what caused his blackout, and he could not recall
any of the details surrounding the accident. The medical records
contained no evidence to link claimant's July 14, 1985 injury by
accident and its sequelae to his June 1, 1994 automobile
accident. Based upon this record, the commission found that claimant
failed to prove that his June 1, 1994 accident was caused by a
seizure related to his July 1985 injuries. The commission held
that any finding on causation between the June 1, 1994 accident
and claimant's seizure disorder would have been based upon pure
speculation.
Because no evidence established that claimant's June 1, 1994
automobile accident was caused by a seizure related to his
compensable July 1985 injury by accident, we cannot find as a
2 matter of law that claimant's evidence sustained his burden of
proof. Therefore, the commission's findings are binding and
conclusive upon us.
Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John C. Edwards, III v. Hoar Construction, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-c-edwards-iii-v-hoar-construction-vactapp-1997.