John C. Edwards, III v. Hoar Construction

CourtCourt of Appeals of Virginia
DecidedJune 17, 1997
Docket0095971
StatusUnpublished

This text of John C. Edwards, III v. Hoar Construction (John C. Edwards, III v. Hoar Construction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John C. Edwards, III v. Hoar Construction, (Va. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Baker, Elder and Fitzpatrick

JOHN C. EDWARDS, III

v. Record No. 0095-97-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM HOAR CONSTRUCTION, INC. JUNE 17, 1997 AND NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (William E. Baggs, on brief), for appellant.

(Fay F. Spence; Spence & Whitlow, on brief), for appellees.

John C. Edwards, III (claimant) contends that the Workers'

Compensation Commission (commission) erred in finding that he

failed to prove that his June 1, 1994 automobile accident

constituted a compensable consequence of his July 14, 1985

industrial injury. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of

the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit.

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule

5A:27.

On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable

to the prevailing party below. See R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v.

Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990).

Unless we can say as a matter of law that claimant's evidence

sustained his burden of proof, the commission's findings are * Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. binding and conclusive upon us. See Tomko v. Michael's

Plastering Co., 210 Va. 697, 699, 173 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1970).

On July 14, 1985, claimant sustained multiple injuries,

including head trauma, when he fell five stories at a

construction site. Two years after the July 1985 compensable

accident, claimant developed post-traumatic seizure disorder.

His physicians prescribed medication to control the seizures.

Prior to June 1994, claimant's last seizure occurred in 1991. On

June 1, 1994, while driving to work, claimant recalled seeing a

gas station and planning to stop for gas. The next event he

remembered was waking up and seeing a police officer. Claimant

did not know what caused his blackout, and he could not recall

any of the details surrounding the accident. The medical records

contained no evidence to link claimant's July 14, 1985 injury by

accident and its sequelae to his June 1, 1994 automobile

accident. Based upon this record, the commission found that claimant

failed to prove that his June 1, 1994 accident was caused by a

seizure related to his July 1985 injuries. The commission held

that any finding on causation between the June 1, 1994 accident

and claimant's seizure disorder would have been based upon pure

speculation.

Because no evidence established that claimant's June 1, 1994

automobile accident was caused by a seizure related to his

compensable July 1985 injury by accident, we cannot find as a

2 matter of law that claimant's evidence sustained his burden of

proof. Therefore, the commission's findings are binding and

conclusive upon us.

Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tomko v. Michael's Plastering Co.
173 S.E.2d 833 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1970)
Bell Lines, Inc. v. Strickland
173 S.E.2d 788 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1970)
R. G. Moore Building Corp. v. Mullins
390 S.E.2d 788 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John C. Edwards, III v. Hoar Construction, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-c-edwards-iii-v-hoar-construction-vactapp-1997.