John Burche v. Carolyn W. Colvin
This text of 513 F. App'x 630 (John Burche v. Carolyn W. Colvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John Burche appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his pro se action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Mr. Burche’s arguments for reversal, we agree with the district court’s reasons for concluding that subject matter jurisdiction was lacking. See Riley v. United States, 486 F.3d 1030, 1031 (8th Cir.2007) (de novo review). The district court also did not err in denying the various motions that Mr. Burche filed prior to entry of judgment. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny as moot Mr. Burche’s pending motions in this court.
. The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
513 F. App'x 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-burche-v-carolyn-w-colvin-ca8-2013.