John Bromley & Sons, Inc. v. United. States

21 Cust. Ct. 238, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 757
United States Customs Court·Decided November 10, 1948·No. No. 52672; protests 56319-K and 65791-K (Philadelphia)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in John Barr v. United States (11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See John Barr v. United States, 324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Bromley & Sons, Inc. v. United. States, 21 Cust. Ct. 238, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 757 (cusc 1948).

21 Cust. Ct. 238 (John Bromley & Sons, Inc. v. United. States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barr v. United States
324 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1945)
Barr v. United States
11 Cust. Ct. 88 (U.S. Customs Court, 1943)