John Beaman, Individually and D/B/A the Bridges at Mission v. Constellation New Energy, Inc.
This text of John Beaman, Individually and D/B/A the Bridges at Mission v. Constellation New Energy, Inc. (John Beaman, Individually and D/B/A the Bridges at Mission v. Constellation New Energy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00695-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
JOHN BEAMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A THE BRIDGES AT MISSION, Appellant,
v.
CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY, INC., Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, John Beaman, Individually and d/b/a The Bridges at Mission, perfected
an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 1 of Hidalgo County,
Texas, in cause number CL-11-2047-A. The parties have filed an agreed motion for
voluntary dismissal of appeal on grounds that all matters in controversy between them in this cause have been fully compromised and settled. The parties request that this Court
dismiss this appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and the agreed motion to
dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a).
The agreed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In
accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring
same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax
costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no
motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 2nd day of February, 2012.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John Beaman, Individually and D/B/A the Bridges at Mission v. Constellation New Energy, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-beaman-individually-and-dba-the-bridges-at-mi-texapp-2012.