JOHN BEAL, INC. v. Hill

Missouri Court of Appeals

JOHN BEAL, INC. v. Hill

326 S.W.3d 827, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1662, 2010 WL 4961611

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 7, 2010·No. ED 94660·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jon E. Führer, Co., Alternative Funding, LLC, Danyielle Burks, and Sean Bu-channon appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of John Beal, Inc. (“Beal”) on his petition to enforce a mechanic’s liens. We find that the trial court did not err in its judgment in favor of Beal.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jon E. Führer, Co., Alternative Funding, LLC, Danyielle Burks, and Sean Bu-channon appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of John Beal, Inc. (“Beal”) on his petition to enforce a mechanic’s liens. We find that the trial court did not err in its judgment in favor of Beal.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

JOHN BEAL, INC. v. Hill, 326 S.W.3d 827, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1662, 2010 WL 4961611 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

326 S.W.3d 827 (JOHN BEAL, INC. v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related