John Barnett v. Thomas C. Bright, James McAndrew, Charles Dickson, J. Leonard Decarlo, Robert Clay Williams and Urology Tyler, P.A.

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 30, 2021
• Docket: 12-21-00019-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

NO. 12-21-00019-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JOHN BARNETT, § APPEAL FROM THE APPELLANT

V.

THOMAS C. BRIGHT, JAMES § COUNTY COURT AT LAW MCANDREW, CHARLES DICKSON, J. LEONARD DECARLO, ROBERT CLAY WILLIAMS AND UROLOGY TYLER, P.A., APPELLEES § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Appellant, John Barnett, filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. In the motion, Barnett states that the parties settled this case. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Opinion delivered June 30, 2021. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JUNE 30, 2021

JOHN BARNETT, Appellant V. THOMAS C. BRIGHT, JAMES MCANDREW, CHARLES DICKSON, J. LEONARD DECARLO, ROBERT CLAY WILLIAMS AND UROLOGY TYLER, P.A., Appellees

Appeal from the County Court at Law of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 71987)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the unopposed motion of the Appellant to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.