John-Baptist Sekumade v. Erik Davis

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 14, 2012·No. 01-12-00137-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued June 14, 2012.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-12-00137-CV

———————————

JOHN-BAPTIST SEKUMADE, Appellant

V.

ERIK DAVIS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-16071

MEMORANDUM OPINION

          Appellant, John-Baptist Sekumade, has neither established indigence nor paid all the required fees.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Tex. Gov’t Code Ann.§ 51.207 (West Supp. 2011), § 51.941(a) (West 2005), § 101.041 (West Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in Tex. R. App. P. app. A§ B(1)(listing fees in court of appeals).  After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

          We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. 

          We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John-Baptist Sekumade v. Erik Davis, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

John-Baptist Sekumade v. Erik Davis (John-Baptist Sekumade v. Erik Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.