John B. Walton, Jr./ Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P. v. Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P./ John B. Walton, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 8, 2007
Docket08-03-00366-CV
StatusPublished

This text of John B. Walton, Jr./ Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P. v. Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P./ John B. Walton, Jr. (John B. Walton, Jr./ Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P. v. Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P./ John B. Walton, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John B. Walton, Jr./ Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P. v. Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P./ John B. Walton, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Form: Dismiss TRAP 42.2 Appellant's Motion

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS


JOHN B. WALTON, JR. / HOOVER, BAX & SLOVACEK, L.L.P.,


                            Appellant/Cross-Appellee,


v.


HOOVER, BAX & SLOVACEK, L.L.P. / JOHN B. WALTON, JR.,


                            Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

§





No. 08-03-00366-CV


Appeal from the


109th Judicial District Court,


Winkler County, Texas


TC# 13,201-A



MEMORANDUM OPINION


            Pending before the Court is a joint motion filed pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 42.1 and 43.2 to vacate the judgments of this Court and the trial court and to dismiss the underlying cause as moot due to settlement.

            On October 14, 2004, we issued our opinion and judgment in this case. Walton v. Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P., 149 S.W.3d 834 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2004, pet. granted). The Supreme Court granted Hoover Slovacek’s petition for review and on November 3, 2006 issued its decision affirming in part and reversing in part. Hoover Slovacek L.L.P. v. Walton, 206 S.W.3d 557 (Tex. 2006). The Supreme Court remanded the cause for consideration of certain issues which were not previously addressed.

            After the Supreme Court issued its mandate, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss requesting that we vacate the judgments of this Court and the trial court and dismiss the underlying cause as moot. That motion is granted. Accordingly, the judgment of this Court, as modified by the Supreme Court, and the judgment of the district court are vacated and the underlying cause is dismissed. Pursuant to Rule 42.1(c), our opinion issued on October 14, 2004 is not withdrawn. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(c).



February 8, 2007

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice


Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoover Slovacek LLP v. Walton
206 S.W.3d 557 (Texas Supreme Court, 2006)
Walton v. Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P.
149 S.W.3d 834 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John B. Walton, Jr./ Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P. v. Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P./ John B. Walton, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-b-walton-jr-hoover-bax-slovacek-llp-v-hoover--texapp-2007.