John B. Hayes v. State
This text of John B. Hayes v. State (John B. Hayes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-10-00006-CR
John B. HAYES, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-CR-5289 Honorable Juanita Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 3, 2010
DISMISSED
John B. Hayes pleaded nolo contendere to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and
pleaded true to an enhancement allegation pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. As part of his plea
bargain, Hayes signed a separate waiver of appeal. The trial court imposed sentence in accordance
with the agreement and signed a certificate stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant
has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). Hayes timely filed a notice of appeal. The 04-10-00006-CR
clerk’s record, which includes the plea bargain agreement and the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2)
certification, has been filed. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a
certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.”
Id.
The court gave Hayes notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial
court certification showing he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record within
thirty days. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San
Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet.
ref’d) (not designated for publication). Hayes’s appointed appellate counsel filed a written response,
stating she has reviewed the record and can find no right of appeal. After reviewing the record and
counsel’s notice, we agree that Hayes does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154
S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to
determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). We therefore dismiss this appeal. TEX . R.
APP . P. 25.2(d).
Do not publish
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John B. Hayes v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-b-hayes-v-state-texapp-2010.