John B. Grinols v. State of Alaska
This text of 15 F.3d 1085 (John B. Grinols v. State of Alaska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
15 F.3d 1085
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
John B. GRINOLS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE of ALASKA, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-35474.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 1, 1994.*
Decided Feb. 3, 1994.
Before: WRIGHT, REAVLEY,** and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM***
For the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Final Report and Recommendation, filed March 16, 1993, which was adopted by the district court on March 22, 1993, we affirm the dismissal of the petitioner's writ of habeas corpus without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies.
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs and without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4
Honorable Thomas M. Reavley, Senior United States Circuit Judge, Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 F.3d 1085, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6767, 1994 WL 32583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-b-grinols-v-state-of-alaska-ca9-1994.