John Aquino, Inc. v. Luigi Bosca & Figlia

241 A.D. 760
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and plaintiff’s motion for a temporary injunction denied, on the ground that the plaintiff has failed to show facts establishing a clear right to a temporary injunction, and that the issue as to which of the two parties is the exclusive agent for the sale of “ Bosea ” wine in this country should be determined on the trial. The defendants are apparently financially responsible for any damages the plaintiff may be able to establish for the period pending the trial; and if the plaintiff should not succeed in its action the business of the defendants would be irreparably damaged by an injunction restraining them from doing business during the period before a trial can be had. The plaintiff may renew the motion if it can be made to appear that the defendants are not financially responsible or that by any acts on their part they are unduly delaying the trial of the action. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Aquino, Inc. v. Luigi Bosca & Figlia, 241 A.D. 760 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

241 A.D. 760 (John Aquino, Inc. v. Luigi Bosca & Figlia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roche v. Bruder
108 Misc. 2d 523 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Mantle Men & Namath Girls, Inc. v. LCR Temporaries, Inc.
39 A.D.2d 681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
Gilbert v. Burnside
6 A.D.2d 834 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)