John Anthony Turner v. Ronald Moats, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland
This text of 56 F.3d 62 (John Anthony Turner v. Ronald Moats, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
56 F.3d 62
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
John Anthony TURNER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Ronald MOATS, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 95-6183.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 25, 1995.
John Anthony Turner, appellant pro se. Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Moats, No. CA-94-2565-S (D. Md Jan. 11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F.3d 62, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19136, 1995 WL 318449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-anthony-turner-v-ronald-moats-warden-attorney-ca4-1995.