John and Mary Ann Tatum v. Julie Hersh

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in John and Mary Ann Tatum v. Julie Hersh. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 13031 →

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 15, 2015·No. 05-14-01318-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered June 11, 2015

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01318-CV

JOHN TATUM, ET AL., Appellants

V.

JULIE HERSH, Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-04185

ORDER Before the Court is appellee’s motion to strike appellants’ combined reply and response

brief. We GRANT the motion and STRIKE appellants’ May 15, 2015 combined reply and

response brief. We ORDER appellant to file, by JUNE 26, 2015, a combined reply and

response brief that complies with rule of appellate procedure 9.4(i)(2)(C). See TEX. R. APP. P.

9.4(i)(2)(C).

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered June 11, 2015

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01318-CV

JOHN TATUM, ET AL., Appellants

V.

JULIE HERSH, Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-04185

ORDER Before the Court is appellee’s motion to strike appellants’ combined reply and response

brief. We GRANT the motion and STRIKE appellants’ May 15, 2015 combined reply and

response brief. We ORDER appellant to file, by JUNE 26, 2015, a combined reply and

response brief that complies with rule of appellate procedure 9.4(i)(2)(C). See TEX. R. APP. P.

9.4(i)(2)(C).

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

John and Mary Ann Tatum v. Julie Hersh, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

John and Mary Ann Tatum v. Julie Hersh (John and Mary Ann Tatum v. Julie Hersh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.