John A. Ramos v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 4, 2015
Docket13-6041
StatusPublished

This text of John A. Ramos v. State of Florida (John A. Ramos v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John A. Ramos v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

JOHN A. RAMOS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D13-6041

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 5, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Kevin A. Blazs, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and A. Victoria Wiggins, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is brought under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Having reviewed the record on appeal, we affirm Appellant’s conviction for

aggravated battery while in actual possession of a firearm and the ten-year

mandatory minimum sentence the trial court imposed. However, the record reveals potential errors in the imposition of costs and

fees, and a discrepancy between the total amount orally announced and the total

reflected in the written judgment and sentence. In order to reverse for sentencing

errors in an Anders appeal, the appellant must have preserved the errors either by

objecting when the sentence was imposed or by filing a motion to correct sentencing

errors. See A.L.B. v. State, 23 So. 3d 190, 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Appellant did

neither in this case; therefore we must affirm. But we do so without prejudice to his

hereafter filing an appropriate post-conviction motion. See A.L.B., 23 So. 3d at 192

(“Today’s affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief

collaterally[.]”); Colon v. State, 869 So. 2d 1290, 1290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

LEWIS, C.J., CLARK and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Colon v. State
869 So. 2d 1290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
A.L.B. v. State
23 So. 3d 190 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John A. Ramos v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-a-ramos-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2015.