John A. Kloster v. S. S. Chatham and Waterman Steamship Corporation
This text of 475 F.2d 43 (John A. Kloster v. S. S. Chatham and Waterman Steamship Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John Kloster, a longshoreman, brought this action for injuries he received while loading pipe from a gondola ear into the S.S. CHATHAM. Kloster alleged unseaworthiness and negligence of the ship’s crew in permitting mooring lines to become slack. The slack, he claims, allowed the CHATHAM to be washed against the pier by the wake of a passing vessel. This movement, he says, caused the ship’s hoisting line to dislodge a section of pipe which struck him. The district court found neither unseaworthiness nor negligence. However, deeming the ease to involve a pierside injury, the *44 court dismissed the suit for lack of admiralty jurisdiction on authority of Victory Carriers v. Law, 404 U.S. 202, 92 S.Ct. 418, 30 L.Ed.2d 383 (1971), and Snydor v. Villain & Fassio et Compania Internazionale di Genova Societa Reunite di Naviagaione S.P.A., 459 F.2d 365 (4th Cir. 1972).
While Kloster’s complaint against the ship and its gear was sufficient" to state a claim within the admiralty jurisdiction of the district court, the findings of fact on the merits of the case are not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
475 F.2d 43, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11262, 1973 A.M.C. 1271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-a-kloster-v-s-s-chatham-and-waterman-steamship-corporation-ca4-1973.