John A. Kloster v. S. S. Chatham and Waterman Steamship Corporation

475 F.2d 43, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11262, 1973 A.M.C. 1271
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 7, 1973·No. 72-1839·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Kloster, a longshoreman, brought this action for injuries he received while loading pipe from a gondola ear into the S.S. CHATHAM. Kloster alleged unseaworthiness and negligence of the ship’s crew in permitting mooring lines to become slack. The slack, he claims, allowed the CHATHAM to be washed against the pier by the wake of a passing vessel. This movement, he says, caused the ship’s hoisting line to dislodge a section of pipe which struck him. The district court found neither unseaworthiness nor negligence. However, deeming the ease to involve a pierside injury, the *44 court dismissed the suit for lack of admiralty jurisdiction on authority of Victory Carriers v. Law, 404 U.S. 202, 92 S.Ct. 418, 30 L.Ed.2d 383 (1971), and Snydor v. Villain & Fassio et Compania Internazionale di Genova Societa Reunite di Naviagaione S.P.A., 459 F.2d 365 (4th Cir. 1972).

While Kloster’s complaint against the ship and its gear was sufficient" to state a claim within the admiralty jurisdiction of the district court, the findings of fact on the merits of the case are not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John A. Kloster v. S. S. Chatham and Waterman Steamship Corporation, 475 F.2d 43, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11262, 1973 A.M.C. 1271 (4th Cir. 1973).

475 F.2d 43 (John A. Kloster v. S. S. Chatham and Waterman Steamship Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related