JOHN A. JAMES v. FIRST SOUTHERN BANK F/K/A THE PATTERSON BANK

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 17, 2017
DocketA17A1657
StatusPublished

This text of JOHN A. JAMES v. FIRST SOUTHERN BANK F/K/A THE PATTERSON BANK (JOHN A. JAMES v. FIRST SOUTHERN BANK F/K/A THE PATTERSON BANK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
JOHN A. JAMES v. FIRST SOUTHERN BANK F/K/A THE PATTERSON BANK, (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ May 16, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A1657. JOHN A. JAMES v. FIRST SOUTHERN BANK f/k/a THE PATTERSON BANK.

First Southern Bank f/k/a The Patterson Bank (“the Bank”) sued John A. James to recover on a promissory note. On January 27, 2017, the trial court granted the Bank’s motion for summary judgment in the amount of $511,459.22. James filed a timely notice of appeal, and the case was transmitted to this Court and docketed as Case Number A17A1435. James subsequently filed a “Motion to Vacate Order and/or Motion to Modify Order” requesting clarification on whether the January 27, 2017 order was final and subject to direct appeal. At James’ request, the trial court entered a modified order holding “there is no just reason for delay, and this Court hereby enters final judgment in favor of [the Bank] in the amount of $511,459.22[.]” In the instant appeal, James seeks to appeal this order. OCGA § 9-11-56 (h) provides, in relevant part, that “[a]n order granting summary judgment on any issue or as to any party shall be subject to review by appeal.” Even without the express determination that there is no just reason for delay, an order granting partial summary judgment may be appealed directly. See Advanced Contouring, Inc. v. McMillan Div. of States Engineering Corp., 179 Ga. App. 128, 128 (2) (345 SE2d 666) (1986). Accordingly, the appeal in Case Number A17A1435 is properly before us. Thus, the appeal in A17A1657, which is duplicative of the appeal in A17A1435, is hereby DISMISSED as superfluous.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 05/16/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
JOHN A. JAMES v. FIRST SOUTHERN BANK F/K/A THE PATTERSON BANK, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-a-james-v-first-southern-bank-fka-the-patterson-bank-gactapp-2017.