John A. Coughlin v. S. P. Ryder, Regional Director, Third United States Civil Service Region

341 F.2d 291, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6531
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedFebruary 15, 1965
Docket14945_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 341 F.2d 291 (John A. Coughlin v. S. P. Ryder, Regional Director, Third United States Civil Service Region) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John A. Coughlin v. S. P. Ryder, Regional Director, Third United States Civil Service Region, 341 F.2d 291, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6531 (3d Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court below was without jurisdiction to entertain the action because of the failure to join indispensable parties, the members of the Civil Service Commission. The members of the Civil Service Commission were not served in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. It is obvious that the relief sought by the appellant, Coughlin, cannot be granted by a decree directed against the appellee, *292 Ryder, alone. Blackmar v. Guerre, 342 U.S. 512, 72 S.Ct. 410, 96 L.Ed. 534 (1952); Adamietz v. Smith, 273 F.2d 385 (3 Cir.), cert. denied 363 U.S. 850, 80 S.Ct. 1628, 4 L.Ed.2d 1732 (1960). It follows that upon the present record the court below was without jurisdiction to entertain the action.

Attention is directed, however, to Section 1391. Title 28 U.S.C., as amended by the Act of December 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 473, adding two new subsections “(e)” and “(f)”. Subsection “(e)” of Section 1391 would permit the members of the Civil Service Commission to be brought upon the record as parties-defendant.

In view of this, the judgment of the court below will be vacated and the cause will be remanded with the direction to permit the plaintiff-appellant, Coughlin, to join the members of the Civil Service Commission as parties-defendant, to be served as provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., and if this be done, to decide the case again upon the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coughlin v. Ryder
260 F. Supp. 256 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
341 F.2d 291, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-a-coughlin-v-s-p-ryder-regional-director-third-united-states-ca3-1965.