Johl v. Town of Groton

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Johl v. Town of Groton

172 Conn. 710

DecidedFebruary 1, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 172 Conn. 710 (Johl v. Town of Groton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johl v. Town of Groton, 172 Conn. 710 (Colo. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

The motion by the named plaintiff to set aside the judgment of the trial court and to direct an entry of judgment for the named plaintiff Peter E. Johl in the appeal from the Superior Court in New London County is denied.

Argued February 1 decided February 1, 1977 Peter R. Johl, pro se, the appellant-appellee (named plaintiff). Walter A. Flynn, Jr., for the appellees (plaintiffs Janet P. Johl Weissman and John H. Johl). James T. Haviland III, town attorney, for the appellee-appellant (defendant).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The motion by the named plaintiff to set aside the judgment of the trial court and to direct an entry of judgment for the named plaintiff Peter E. Johl in the appeal from the Superior Court in New London County is denied.

Argued February 1 decided February 1, 1977 Peter R. Johl, pro se, the appellant-appellee (named plaintiff). Walter A. Flynn, Jr., for the appellees (plaintiffs Janet P. Johl Weissman and John H. Johl). James T. Haviland III, town attorney, for the appellee-appellant (defendant).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 Conn. 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johl-v-town-of-groton-conn-1977.