Johl v. Town of Groton

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Johl v. Town of Groton

172 Conn. 710

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 1, 1977·Published

Opinion

The motion by the named plaintiff to set aside the judgment of the trial court and to direct an entry of judgment for the named plaintiff Peter E. Johl in the appeal from the Superior Court in New London County is denied.

Argued February 1 decided February 1, 1977 Peter R. Johl, pro se, the appellant-appellee (named plaintiff). Walter A. Flynn, Jr., for the appellees (plaintiffs Janet P. Johl Weissman and John H. Johl). James T. Haviland III, town attorney, for the appellee-appellant (defendant).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The motion by the named plaintiff to set aside the judgment of the trial court and to direct an entry of judgment for the named plaintiff Peter E. Johl in the appeal from the Superior Court in New London County is denied.

Argued February 1 decided February 1, 1977 Peter R. Johl, pro se, the appellant-appellee (named plaintiff). Walter A. Flynn, Jr., for the appellees (plaintiffs Janet P. Johl Weissman and John H. Johl). James T. Haviland III, town attorney, for the appellee-appellant (defendant).

Johl v. Town of Groton, 172 Conn. 710 (Colo. 1977).

Pincite

172 Conn. 710 (Johl v. Town of Groton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.