Johary Aviation, Inc. v. Turan

47 So. 3d 333, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15588, 2010 WL 4024718
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 15, 2010
Docket5D09-2794
StatusPublished

This text of 47 So. 3d 333 (Johary Aviation, Inc. v. Turan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johary Aviation, Inc. v. Turan, 47 So. 3d 333, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15588, 2010 WL 4024718 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

COHEN, J.

Johary Aviation, Inc., appeals the denial of its motion to set aside default. We reverse. Initially, we reject the argument that Johary Aviation did not timely file its notice of appeal. See BMW Fin. Servs. NA, LLC v. Alger, 834 So.2d 408, 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (holding that denial of a motion to set aside default is not an ap-pealable non-final order); Shell v. Foulkes, 19 So.3d 438, 440 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that “[a]n order merely entering a default without a consequent final judgment is not a final order.”); Trawick, Fla. Prac. & Proc., § 25:2 (2007 ed.) (default not a judgment). The notice of appeal was timely filed and this court has jurisdiction.

The trial court erred in denying the motion to set aside default because Johary Aviation filed a motion to dismiss and a motion for more definite statement before the default was entered. These motions precluded the entry of default. 1 See Carder v. Pelican Cove West Homeowners Ass’n, Inc., 595 So.2d 174 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Abelson v. First Nationwide Bank, *334 545 So.2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Consequently, the order denying the motion to set aside default must be reversed and Johary Aviation given the chance to defend. See Dawkins, Inc. v. Huff, 836 So.2d 1062 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (recognizing that policy in this state is to liberally vacate defaults so disputes can be reached on their merits).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
1

. We also note that Johary Aviation appeared at the hearing on the motion for default through counsel and attempted to adopt a pleading filed by a co-defendant as its answer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shell v. Foulkes
19 So. 3d 438 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Carder v. PELICAN COVE W. HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
595 So. 2d 174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Dawkins, Inc. v. Huff
836 So. 2d 1062 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Abelson v. First Nationwide Bank
545 So. 2d 414 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
BMW Financial Services NA, LLC v. Alger
834 So. 2d 408 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 So. 3d 333, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15588, 2010 WL 4024718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johary-aviation-inc-v-turan-fladistctapp-2010.