Johann v. Van Arsdale

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Johann v. Van Arsdale

372 So. 2d 1003, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15056

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 11, 1979

DocketNos. 78-482, 78-1500

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 372 So. 2d 1003 (Johann v. Van Arsdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johann v. Van Arsdale, 372 So. 2d 1003, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15056 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These are consolidated appeals from a final judgment denying appellant’s action for damages on a claim of usury and a final judgment denying appellant’s complaint for foreclosure of a mortgage but awarding appellant the balance due on a note secured by the mortgage. We find no error by the trial court except in its failure to award the appellant interest on the amount due on the mortgage note up to the date of entry of the latter final judgment. Accordingly, the final judgment in case No. 78-482 is affirmed; the final judgment in case No. 78-1500 is affirmed in part and reversed in part to the extent that the trial court is hereby directed to enter judgment in favor of appellant for interest on the amount awarded up to the date of judgment.

ANSTEAD and MOORE, JJ., and GEIGER, DWIGHT L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These are consolidated appeals from a final judgment denying appellant’s action for damages on a claim of usury and a final judgment denying appellant’s complaint for foreclosure of a mortgage but awarding appellant the balance due on a note secured by the mortgage. We find no error by the trial court except in its failure to award the appellant interest on the amount due on the mortgage note up to the date of entry of the latter final judgment. Accordingly, the final judgment in case No. 78-482 is affirmed; the final judgment in case No. 78-1500 is affirmed in part and reversed in part to the extent that the trial court is hereby directed to enter judgment in favor of appellant for interest on the amount awarded up to the date of judgment.

ANSTEAD and MOORE, JJ., and GEIGER, DWIGHT L., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

372 So. 2d 1003, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johann-v-van-arsdale-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack