Jofre v. Greenberg

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jofre v. Greenberg

555 So. 2d 416, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7175, 1989 WL 153758

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 19, 1989

DocketNo. 89-666

StatusPublished

This text of 555 So. 2d 416 (Jofre v. Greenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jofre v. Greenberg, 555 So. 2d 416, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7175, 1989 WL 153758 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is the rule that a summary judgment should not stand if a merely defective prior showing in opposition to the motion is corrected within the rehearing time. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40, 46 (Fla.1966). On the basis of this determination as applied to the facts and circumstances of this case, [417]*417the order denying rehearing of the summary judgment entered below is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to grant rehearing and deny summary judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It is the rule that a summary judgment should not stand if a merely defective prior showing in opposition to the motion is corrected within the rehearing time. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40, 46 (Fla.1966). On the basis of this determination as applied to the facts and circumstances of this case, [417]*417the order denying rehearing of the summary judgment entered below is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to grant rehearing and deny summary judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

555 So. 2d 416, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7175, 1989 WL 153758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jofre-v-greenberg-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack