Joffroy v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Joffroy v. United States

54 Cust. Ct. 298, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2217

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 13, 1965

DocketNo. 69004; protests 63/23240, etc. (San Diego)

StatusPublished

This text of 54 Cust. Ct. 298 (Joffroy v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joffroy v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 298, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2217 (cusc 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of soluble or instant coffee (containing no admixture of [299]*299sugar, cereal, or other additive), a product of Mexico, entered or withdrawn from warehouse prior to August 31, 1963, the effective date of the Tariff Schedules of the United States; that the protests were pending for decision by this court on June 30, 1964, the date of enactment of Public Law 88-337; and that within 120 days after the date of enactment a request was filed with the collector of customs for reliquidation and classification of the merchandise free of duty under said Public Law, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of soluble or instant coffee (containing no admixture of [299]*299sugar, cereal, or other additive), a product of Mexico, entered or withdrawn from warehouse prior to August 31, 1963, the effective date of the Tariff Schedules of the United States; that the protests were pending for decision by this court on June 30, 1964, the date of enactment of Public Law 88-337; and that within 120 days after the date of enactment a request was filed with the collector of customs for reliquidation and classification of the merchandise free of duty under said Public Law, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 Cust. Ct. 298, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joffroy-v-united-states-cusc-1965.