Joey McCutchen v. Richardson & Stoops
This text of Joey McCutchen v. Richardson & Stoops (Joey McCutchen v. Richardson & Stoops) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 02-1258 ___________
Sheryl H. McKinney, as parent and * next friend of Christy R. McKinney, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.; Ford * Western District of Arkansas. Motor Company, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendants, * * St. Edward Mercy Medical Center, * * Movant, * * Joey McCutchen, * * Movant - Appellant, * * Richardson, Stoops, Richardson & * Ward, * * Movant - Appellee. * ___________
Submitted: July 5, 2002 Filed: July 23, 2002 ___________
Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
In this diversity tort action, attorney Joey McCutchen appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment as to his Arkansas attorney-lien claim. See Ark. Code Ann. § 16-22-304 (Michie 1999). Upon de novo review, see First Bank of Marietta v. Hogge, 161 F.3d 506, 510 (8th Cir. 1998), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1 The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. -2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joey McCutchen v. Richardson & Stoops, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joey-mccutchen-v-richardson-stoops-ca8-2002.