Joesam Homes, Inc. v. Weisser
This text of 146 Misc. 6 (Joesam Homes, Inc. v. Weisser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendants do not admit that this is a spite fence. If it is a spite fence, that will be determined at the trial. Defendants will be responsible and the court may give ample relief. I am asked to enjoin defendants. There is no reason to do so. They build at their own risk. If they are wrong, they will have to tear down what they have erected and pay damages. I am making no decision as to the fence. Temporary injunctions are only granted in great emergencies. The only emergency here is the loss of light and air by plaintiff for the short period between the completion of the fence (if it is completed) and the trial, which will not be long because the part hearing these cases is only a few months behind.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 Misc. 6, 260 N.Y.S. 515, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joesam-homes-inc-v-weisser-nysupct-1932.