Joemar Jackson v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-11-00179-CR
JOEMAR JACKSON APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
Appellant Joemar Jackson attempts to appeal from the denial of his pro se
motion for use of the trial record on a loan basis. On May 24, 2011, we notified
Jackson of our concern that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, and we
informed him that unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal files with
the court, on or before June 3, 2011, a response showing grounds for continuing
the appeal, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. App. P. 44.3. We have received no response. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Self v. State, 122
S.W.3d 294, 294–95 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2003, no pet.) (dismissing appeal for
want of jurisdiction where trial court denied appellant’s request for free copy of
trial court’s records to prosecute post-conviction writ of habeas corpus); Crear v.
State, No. 14-05-00222-CR, 2005 WL 914123, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th
Dist.] Apr. 21, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication)
(dismissing for want of jurisdiction appeal of denial of pro se motion to obtain
records and request for loan of trial records).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: July 28, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joemar Jackson v. State (Joemar Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.