Joel v. State

28 Tex. 642
Texas Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1866·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Donley, J.

—The sixth division of article 395 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in defining what shall be [644] sufficient allegations in an indictment, provides that the time mentioned must be some date anterior to the presentment of the indictment.

The indictment in this case alleges the offense to have been committed on the 25th day of ¡November, 1866, the same day on which the indictment was returned and filed in the court.

There is no allegation that the offense was committed anterior to the finding by the grand jury. This allegation is a positive requisition of the law, and must be observed, The judgment is reversed, and the cause

¡Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joel v. State, 28 Tex. 642 (Tex. 1866).

28 Tex. 642 (Joel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. State
184 So. 31 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Combest v. State
1931 OK CR 259 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1931)
Goddard v. State
14 Tex. Ct. App. 566 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)
Williams v. State
12 Tex. Ct. App. 226 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1882)
York v. State
3 Tex. Ct. App. 15 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1877)
Nelson v. State
1 Tex. Ct. App. 556 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1877)