Joel v. Ritterman
5 Redf. 136
Opinion
The manner in which the motion was argued indicated that the attachment sought was under section 2555 of the Code, as for a contempt, which has no application to the proceedings, the decree having-been entered before September 1, 1880 (§ 3347, subd. 11). But the moving papers seem to justify the issuing of an attachment under section 10, subd. 4, of 3 R. S., 327 (6 ed.), which must be in form similar to that used by the court of chancery in analogous cases.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joel v. Ritterman, 5 Redf. 136 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1881).
5 Redf. 136 (Joel v. Ritterman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of David
4 Mills Surr. 364 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1904)
In re the Estate of Doffy
1 How. Pr. (n.s.) 240 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1886)