Joel v. Ritterman

New York Surrogate's Court

Joel v. Ritterman

5 Redf. 136

CourtNew York Surrogate's Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1881

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 5 Redf. 136 (Joel v. Ritterman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joel v. Ritterman, 5 Redf. 136 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

The Surrogate.

The manner in which the motion was argued indicated that the attachment sought was under section 2555 of the Code, as for a contempt, which has no application to the proceedings, the decree having-been entered before September 1, 1880 (§ 3347, subd. 11). But the moving papers seem to justify the issuing of an attachment under section 10, subd. 4, of 3 R. S., 327 (6 ed.), which must be in form similar to that used by the court of chancery in analogous cases.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Surrogate.

The manner in which the motion was argued indicated that the attachment sought was under section 2555 of the Code, as for a contempt, which has no application to the proceedings, the decree having-been entered before September 1, 1880 (§ 3347, subd. 11). But the moving papers seem to justify the issuing of an attachment under section 10, subd. 4, of 3 R. S., 327 (6 ed.), which must be in form similar to that used by the court of chancery in analogous cases.

Ordered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Redf. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joel-v-ritterman-nysurct-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack